Questionaire

[Sparrisen]

Alright, purpose of this topic is not to analyze *why* I would ask such a question, but rather, to answer the question I ask as honestly as possible. There will be at least one follow-up question later.

1. If you imagine chicks, but without breasts, would you still love them?

[Oynamak]

pussy without tits = men/woman mix. Maybe ok for a bi-sexual guy.


But for me its a no. Too much feminity lost.


Man is man. We are supposed to love tits and asses. Atleast I am.
I love a girl not only because of her personality, but also because of her face/body. And if her ass/face ain't AMAZING that my dick goes boom boom, I don't see how this could work without tits. (Escpecially in the long run).



Would there be an alternative to breastless chicks? <.<


edit: do you mean with "love", still being sexually attracted to chicks, or "loving a girl without breasts".
If it is the first one, I'd say yes. Less, but yes.

[Persus]

OK here's looking at it from another point of view. You meet the woman of your dreams. Fall madly in love and Get married. The marriage is perfection then after a fair few years your beloved finds out she has a lump in her breast and the only way to save her life is a mastectomy. After the operation she chooses not to get the breasts replaced by fake boobs as a number of women do. Same out come.

Would you still love that person as much? Truthfully Only a superficial Douche bag wouldn't.

[Sparrisen]

interesting point of view, please answer yourself as well

[Persus]

If it became the normal look for women I bet it wouldn't take men anytime at all to get used to it. I guess what I am trying to say is ultimatley it is the person and not the body you should be looking at. The body grows old and wastes away. The person inside that body remains a constant and grows with you. (Reading that back it sounds like some sort of Self help bollocks) But I stand by my point.

[Oynamak]

Well also depents. If the person is unhappy with herself due to that, she might be insecure, have doubts about herself, how she looks. Some women have complexes because of 20kg too much. Now having no breasts as a women.. It could/will affect their personality, their attitude. This could have an negative effect on your relationship. Like it's another person. Love gets weaker, the women more depressive. Etc.


Could be. You could live with her, but she can't live with herself.

[Sparrisen]

Hmm, in the question however, I state "chicks", as in plural, not one specific case.

To dump your girlfriend, wife or whatever because she had breastcancer involves other factors, such as, failing your girlfriend when she trusts you and stuff like that. I mean the appeal of chicks, generally. I'm sure you will love your mom even if she lost her tits, but it's not what I'm asking.
Maby you'd still stick with your girlfriend, because you're a trustable bloke, but that's not what I'm asking either. I'm not asking weather you're trustable or dependable.

Also, next question is coming up, centered around the same theme, I'd sure like more feedback on this one before I post the next though. I think it's an interesting question.

[Hullu]

When I dream about a girl, it usually doesn't involve any kind of sexual interaction. I wouldn't care about her tits, if only I could have her. *cuddle cuddle purrr*

[Oynamak]

ive seen a girl with almost no tits, rly just a real small bow, a white dress. Amazing face and smile and ass. Damn she was hot. But tits usually make girls more attraktive, so when their face aint that pretty and cute, i'd rather say no. But they can look amazingly hot n cute too,but most would loose alot of attractiveness, most dont profit from it . But a few, It makes em more sweet, and sweet girs are extremely hot . So yes, but very dependent.

[Smiskfisk]

Yes.

[Sparrisen]

2. If you imagine chicks, but without breasts and with no vagina*, would you still love them?


*Not meaning their transsexuals, (in which case they would've had a penis) just meaning there's nothing there.

[Hullu]

My answer still applies.

[Oynamak]

yes. I think love aint bind to physical parts of your body. Its our thinking only that could make us "not love, BECAUSE..". But there's no reason to not love. So.

[Hullu]

Your last answer is in conflict with your newest.

[Oynamak]

because the first one was more facile and was in comparissen to other girls with breasts. rest stays the same, sexuel. now i wouldnt compare breast and vaginaless women with the ones that have both, so i kinda have another standpoint there, from another point of view. 2 different answers for 2 different questions, they are in conflict with eachother if you combine them for each question.
 but if i had to choose, the last one would fit better if one of them taken for both questions.